Published in: the Review of Economic Studies, 84(7), July 2020 (pp. 1989-2018)
Abstract. In this article, I directly test the hypothesis that interactions between inventors of different firms drive knowledge spillovers. I construct a network of publicly traded companies in which each link is a function of the relative proportion of two firms’ inventors who have former patent collaborators in both organizations. I use this measure to weigh the impact of R&D performed by each firm on the productivity and innovation outcomes of its network linkages. An empirical concern is that the resulting estimates may reflect unobserved, simultaneous determinants of firm performance, network connections, and external R&D. I address this problem with an innovative IV strategy, motivated by a game-theoretic model of firm interaction. I instrument the R&D of one firm’s connections with that of other firms that are sufficiently distant in network space. With the resulting spillover estimates, I calculate that among firms connected to the network the marginal social return of R&D amounts to approximately 112% of the marginal private return.
Abstract. We explore the effect of a reduction in overall labor costs, indirectly induced by an Italian reform that weakened employment protection legislation, on the productivity distribution of manufacturing firms. Due to the unique institutional features of the Italian collective bargaining system, in the manufacturing sector the reform led to a clean reduction in average worker compensation, without altering the average structure of employment relationships. This decrease in labor cost resulted in a reduction in average total factor productivity (TFP) among less productive firms, and an increase at the upper end of the distribution. We pair these findings with increased entry and exit dynamics among low-productivity firms, suggesting the presence of an adverse selection mechanism at the bottom of the TFP distribution, enhanced by the reform. We formalize this concept via a general equilibrium model that links productivity to frictions in the markets for inputs.
Abstract. We study the effects of acquisitions on firms and their production networks in Türkiye using rich administrative firm-to-firm transaction data. Leveraging a staggered event-study design, we compare post-acquisition outcomes of target firms and their trading partners to matched controls. Acquisitions increase the intangible intensity of target firms but have no consistent effects on conventional performance measures. A key finding is that the network consequences of acquisitions depend on the acquirer’s origin. Domestic acquisitions lead to tangible capital deepening and strengthen existing buyer-supplier relationships along the intensive margin, while foreign acquisitions tend to shift production toward outsourcing and diversify network connections. We argue that these differences stem from variation in firms’ relationship capability: their ability to sustain productive links in a network governed by incomplete contracts.
Abstract. We develop a model of staged entry: to operate, monopolistically competitive firms must pay two sequential entry costs, each time acquiring a more informative signal of future performance. This model yields two implications for fiscal policy. First, the equilibrium outcome is constrained-efficient if preferences are CES and entry costs are exogenous. Second, when entry costs depend on how many firms pass any entry stage (due to positive knowledge spillovers or negative congestion effects) the resulting externalities can be offset via Pigouvian taxes or subsidies that are timed around the relevant entry decisions. A calibration exercise based on U.S. firm-entry data shows that these policies would raise welfare through a wider pool of entrants and sharper selection of productive firms.